OpenAI & Anthropic Integration Service
Senior engineers building production LLM features: chat, RAG, agents, function calling, evals, and cost controls.
Why Most LLM Features Fail in Production
Wiring up an OpenAI or Anthropic API call takes ten minutes. Building an LLM feature that does not embarrass you in production takes weeks. The demo always works on the cherry-picked example; production is the long tail of user input that breaks the prompt, leaks PII, exceeds rate limits, hits context windows, or generates plausible nonsense your customers cite as fact.
Most LLM features ship without guardrails. No structured output schemas (so the model occasionally returns invalid JSON). No retries with exponential backoff (so a single 429 kills the request). No prompt versioning (so when the model is updated, behaviour silently changes). No evals (so regressions are detected by customers, not by CI). We rebuild LLM features with all of this in place.
Cost controls are the part founders forget until the bill arrives. A logged-out endpoint that hits GPT-4 is a denial-of-wallet attack waiting to happen. Streaming responses still cost the full output tokens. Caching the cheap parts (system prompts, retrieved context, function definitions) cuts costs significantly. We design the cost shape from day one.
Anthropic vs OpenAI is not "which is better." It is "which is right for this task at this price point." Claude is stronger at long-context reasoning and instruction following. GPT-4 is stronger at structured output and certain coding tasks. Smaller models (Haiku, GPT-4 Mini) are dramatically cheaper for classification and extraction. A senior engineer picks per task, sometimes routes between them dynamically.
AsyncForge has senior engineers shipping LLM features in production today. Submit a chat interface, a RAG pipeline, an agent, an extraction job, or a full LLM integration. Light 4 days, Standard 48 hours, Pro 1 day. Includes prompt versioning, evals, and cost controls.
What You Get
Structured output
Tool use / function calling with JSON schemas. Output validated with Zod. Retries with reformat when validation fails.
Streaming UI
Server-sent events or Anthropic streaming, rendered in the UI with proper cancellation when the user navigates away.
Prompt versioning
Prompts stored as code with semantic versions. Changes go through PR review. Old versions remain callable for backwards compatibility.
Eval suite
Pytest-style evals run in CI. Promptfoo or a custom harness, with regression detection on every model or prompt change.
Cost controls
Per-user quotas, per-org rate limits, model-tier routing (cheap model first, expensive only when needed), and prompt caching where supported.
Safety guardrails
PII redaction in prompts, output filtering, jailbreak resistance via system prompts and post-filters, and content moderation hooks.
Technologies We Use
How It Works With AsyncForge
Subscribe
Plan ready.
Submit LLM work
Chat, RAG, agents, extraction, full integrations.
We deliver
Evaluated, cost-bounded, production-grade.
Iterate
Revisions on prompts and behaviour.
Frequently Asked Questions
Learn More
Subscription vs Freelancers
See why startups are switching from freelancers to dev subscriptions.
Subscription vs Traditional Agency
How a development subscription compares to hiring a traditional agency.
Complete Guide to Productized Development
Everything you need to know about the productized development model.
How AsyncForge Works
From signup to shipped code in four simple steps.